Economia Circolare
Resource licensed under
Creative Commons BY NC 4.0
Image of the resource: Economia Circolare

Economia Circolare

EDUCATIONAL LEVEL :   Secondary education

 | 

Educational areas:  Scientific and technological

 | 

Language:  Italian


Publication date  
LEARNING OBJECTIVES
  • Comprendere il concetto di economia circolare e la sua importanza nella tutela dell'ambiente.
  • Identificare i principi chiave dell'economia circolare: ridurre, riutilizzare, riciclare.
  • Analizzare i benefici dell'economia circolare per l'ambiente, l'economia e la società.
  • Esplorare esempi concreti di economia circolare nella vita quotidiana e nelle aziende.
  • Sviluppare una consapevolezza critica e un senso di responsabilità verso l'ambiente e le risorse naturali.
Activities
  • Brainstorming: Gli studenti discutono in gruppo per identificare i problemi ambientali causati dal modello economico lineare e i potenziali benefici dell'economia circolare.
  • Mappa mentale: Ogni studente crea una mappa mappa concettuale con l'aiuto di un software per la realizzazione di mappe on line, es. coggle 
  • Ricerca: Gli studenti scelgono un prodotto o un processo e ne analizzano il ciclo di vita, identificando le opportunità per applicare i principi dell'economia circolare.
  • Debate: La classe viene divisa in due gruppi che si confrontano sui pro e i contro dell'economia circolare - Ogni gruppo presenta un elebaorato (Canva o simili) per descrivere i pro e i contro
  • Progetto creativo: Gli studenti realizzano un progetto creativo (poster, video, presentazione) per sensibilizzare sull'importanza dell'economia circolare.
Tools
Assessment methods
  • Rifiuti
  • Economia Circolare
  • Riciclo
  • Discariche

0 8 0
Cookies are important for you, they influence on your navigation experience and they help us protect your privacy. closer uses tracking services and cookies analysis, both own and from third parties, to improve our services and with research and development purposes. More information in our "Cookies policy".
Are you sure you want to delete this comment?
Duplica el recurs
Warning
Do you want to delete this resource?
education_level
Secondary education
Language
Italian
Send validation?
All requirements are fullfilled, the resource will obtain the validation closer badge
Not all requirements are fullfilled, the resource will not obtaing the closer badge
Has the sequence didactic sense?

Well sequenced, following some sort of didactid order: starts from the alumni ideas and augments both in completeness and abstraction level. For instance, following the learning cycle, inquiry cycle, modeling cycle, ABPs structure...
antivirus.popup.title
Scoring criteria
Basic requirements

You must comply all requirements (YES box) to validate the resource.
Didactical requirements

Achieve a mínimum of 39 points (13 ítems x 3 points)

Newbie = 1 point
Adequate = 3 points
Advanced = 5 points
Obtained score
Basic requirements
Is it directly involved with a STEM discipline?
Does it include the alumni material?
Does it include the teacher guidelines and materials?
Is the information in the right section of the platform?
Does the material present a clear structure and preserves the document style?
Are the documents redacted correctly?
Is it correct from an ethic point of view?
Didactical requirements
Are the kew knowledges specified?
validation.form.
Has the sequence didactic sense?
validation.form.
Is the alumni facing a challenge or a question? (in a daily basis, game, regularity…)
validation.form.
Does it leads to apply already acquired knowledges and/or to learn new things?
validation.form.
Does it helps to link diverse knowledges (within one discipline or within different disciplines)?
validation.form.
Is it a resource that can be developed in different forms and stimulates the curiosity and creativity of the alumni?
validation.form.
Does it imply the diverse tools usage such as material that can be manipulated, drawing tools, softwares, calculators, etc.?
validation.form.
Does it encourages authonomy and alumni iniciative?
validation.form.
Do we intervene based on adequate questions rather tan explanations?
validation.form.
Is it put into stake the work and individual effort, but also the pair or group work that leads to talk, argue, convince, agree, etc.?
validation.form.
Does it imply reasoning about what has been done and justify the results?
validation.form.
Does it promote explicitly the value work of the alumni? (I.e.: sostenibility, gender equality…)
validation.form.
Does it include an evaluation system to accompany the knowledge?
validation.form.
Duplication history and/or previous versions
Resource title
Author
License
Complain about the resource

closer contact

ldshake@upf.edu

Your e-mail

Resource URL

https://ildeplus.upf.edu/CLOSER/pg/lds/resource/7074

Reason for the complain

Complain detailed description

You must include a reason and a detailed description.

Email address

Password

 
Cookie settings
Cookies are important for you, they influence on your navigation experience and they help us protect your privacy. closer uses tracking services and cookies analysis, both own and from third parties, to improve our services and with research and development purposes. More information in our "Cookies policy".